Photokina: Nikon defends lack of large-sensor CSC

Posted by TheFanStory 정보 : 2014. 9. 25. 10:09

http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/photo-news/photokina-nikon-defends-lack-large-sensor-csc-34658



Nikon Europe has brushed aside the rise of the large-sensor compact system camera, dismissing them as no longer ‘compact’ in size. The firm insists this gives the Nikon 1, a system launched three years ago, an edge over its rivals.

Asked why Nikon has not introduced a CSC with a large sensor, such as APS-C-size or full frame, Dirk Jasper, product manager at Nikon Europe’s professional products planning division, said: ‘You shouldn’t underestimate the Nikon 1 system…

‘OK, it’s a 1in sensor and not full frame, or APS-C-size.

‘On the other hand it gives us advantages over other systems because, looking at systems that have this size of sensor, sorry to say, they are no longer compact.’

Meanwhile, Jasper said Nikon has not been able to fulfil demand for the Nikon 1 V3 (pictured above) because the ‘response has been so great’.

In an interview with AP at Photokina, Jasper observed that some CSCs are moving closer in size to DSLRs, citing as examples the Fuji X-T1 (below) and Sony Alpha 7 models.

‘We have, and always will, bring new technologies to the market, but not at all costs…’


Jasper accepted that there has been growth in the CSC market but added: ‘The market is growing moderately, but that’s on a very small scale [in relation] to the size of the [overall] market.

‘In terms of total value and units, it is really small compared to what DSLR is still doing.’

Last month, Nikon revealed that it had suffered a 31% drop in global sales of interchangeable-lens digital cameras in the three months to 30 June.

‘The whole market has contracted since last year,’ said Jasper who explained that it is not simply a case of people now deciding to buy a CSC instead of a DSLR.

‘Mirrorless is not growing by the same amount.’

Nikon has faced questions about whether it will make a mirrorless camera for professional photographers.

Will Nikon, realistically, ever launch a professional-level mirrorless camera when so many of its users have invested in expensive lens and accessory systems over many years?

Jasper stressed that Nikon has already shown that DSLRs are not the ‘Holy Grail’, by launching the Nikon 1.

Though he could not predict whether DSLRs will be around forever, he claims they offer advantages over CSCs, in terms of AF speed, tracking and ‘reliability of the life cycle’.

And a high-end mirrorless system would need to win acceptance from professionals and many loyal enthusiasts – as well as offering the same ‘ecosystem’ as DSLR.

‘We race Formula 1. There are no second places here.

‘Yes, it [a professional mirrorless camera] might happen one day, but we cannot offer a “second best” solution for professionals…’


Read more at http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/photo-news/photokina-nikon-defends-lack-large-sensor-csc-34658#7378qL7tHPxMUTrK.99


  

[DPREVIEW]

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7726365599/photokina-2014-nikon-interview-large-sensor-mirrorless-could-be-a-solution



Toshiaki Akagi, Department Manager in Nikon's 1st Designing Department of the Development Center in the Imaging Business Unit. Pictured at Photokina in Germany.


When we visited Photokina last week in Germany we made time to sit down with senior executives from several camera manufacturers. Among them was Toshiaki Akagi, Department Manager in Nikon's 1st Designing Department. In our conversation we spoke about reaction to the D750, the legacy of the D600 oil problem and the potential for a large-sensor mirrorless camera from Nikon in the future.


What has reaction been like to the new D750?

It has been very well-received, globally. Especially the new body design using carbon-fiber material, and the tilting screen. The camera is intended to offer more versatility and greater usability in its position between the D610 and D810.

How important was video when you were planning the D750?

Because of our history and background, our first priority is high-quality still images. But we have to pay attention to market demand for movie features. 4K for example is something we have to study very carefully - when, and how we can provide a camera to meet demand to satisfy our customers. 



When we spoke to Nikon earlier this year we were told that you were seeing demand for 4K from some of your users - has work progressed in the meantime?

Work is ongoing - we cannot of course speak about forthcoming products but we have some ideas about [how to add] a 4K movie function to our DSLR lineup. There are several factors to consider when doing this - for example the image processing engine. So there are a lot of factors to study in order to find the best-balanced solution for a camera in the future. But it’s going well, and you can expect something in the future - maybe!

Do you think 4K is a technology of interest to filmmakers and stills photographers?

This is just my personal opinion - I am not speaking for Nikon. In my opinion, 4K is too much. Our current movie functionality is enough for our users. But some of our competitors, like Panasonic and Sony are adding 4K so we should aim for the same level of functionality in order to compete. 

Can you summarize your full-frame camera strategy?

Starting with the new camera, the D750, this is a lightweight, streamlined camera which is easy to carry, which offers a tilt LCD. That’s the concept for this product. The D810 is meant to deliver the widest dynamic range at low ISO sensitivities. The D4S is for customers who need more speed and durability. The D610 fulfills a demand for a reasonably priced full-frame camera, for more cost-sensitive customers.

Looking at the lenses that Nikon has released over the past few years, you have made a lot more full-frame FX-format optics than DX. Are you more focused on your full-frame customers?

We’ve been making new FX format cameras like the D810 and D750, so we need to have a good lineup of FX lenses. But of course we have the DX format lineup too and you can expect some new DX lenses in the future. We haven’t forgotten about our DX customers.



Do you want to move customers that might be (say) D300S users up to full-frame?

A certain portion of our DX customers have already moved up to full-frame sensors. But not all. We understand that there is still some demand for a successor to the D300S and all we can say at this moment is that we are studying that demand.

The D600 had a well-publicized problem with oil on its sensor, which affected a lot of your customers. A lot of people were very unhappy with Nikon’s response. If something like this comes up again in the future, would you handle things differently?

Internally, we took that issue very seriously, and when we created the D750 we reviewed our quality control process. It’s impossible to say for certain that we could avoid this kind of thing in the future, but we have certainly minimized the risk. As for handling such an issue differently it’s difficult to say since we cannot predict what might happen. But the D600 issue was very important, and very sensitive and we are trying our best to avoid that kind of problem again.

How will you approach the next few years?

It’s very difficult to say actually, because the market changes so quickly. So even if we believe we should follow a certain strategy a new product might come out from one of our competitors and everything might change. One issue is that people are replacing their cameras less frequently than in the past. People want better products but want to spend less money. So we have to decide what to prioritize.

If there was one area where you could improve modern digital cameras, what would it be?

Well there are two - firstly speed, in terms not only of AF but also general responsiveness. And secondly of course, image quality. We have some room to make further improvements [in both areas].



Are you seeing demand for a higher-resolution flagship, like a D3X replacement?

Yes, we know that some of our customers want a D3X successor. But again, we need to study this carefully. Which type of product should we prepare first - a successor to the D4S, or a replacement for the D3X? Speed, or resolution? We need to listen carefully to our customers.

As the DSLR market falters, what is your strategy for mirrorless?

The mirrorless market is growing rapidly, thanks to products from manufacturers like Sony. We know that there is a certain body of demand for larger sensors in mirrorless products. Although we already have the 1 inch sensor in the 1 System, we don't want to deny the possibility of future large-sensor mirrorless cameras. So maybe if there is enough demand we may be able to provide another type of mirrorless camera with larger sensors. This is one of the solutions.

  

[DPREVIEW]

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/0661793352/photokina-2014-sony-interview-we-still-need-to-create-more-lenses


Could you summarize Sony’s camera strategy in one sentence?

We want to make serious cameras. In terms of our compact cameras, for example, the RX-series is the core. They’re differentiated from our competitors by offering big sensors, great picture quality and sophisticated cosmetic design. 

How important are new photographers to Sony compared to experts or enthusiasts?

In business terms, entry-level users, or amateurs are very important because there are so many opportunities. Traditional photo enthusiasts might be fond of using more traditional systems such as those from Canon or Nikon. They stick to those ecosystems, since they have a lot of lenses. But beginners might not have those kind of loyalties. We want to stimulate the interest of those customers in photography.

But we also need to earn a good reputation among professionals and higher-level amateurs. It’s kind of a chicken and egg situation. So firstly, our strategy is to get that reputation with enthusiasts. That’s why we started to make these serious, high-end cameras. And for the moment, we think, it is proving successful.

Do you think there is a gap in your lineup for a truly entry-level RX-series camera?

Yes and no. We are attracting a lot of new customers with the original RX100. It might look like a serious camera, but from an entry-level users’ point of view they can still take a good photography with a single press of a button. Any amateur photographer can use an RX100. The RX100 III is the top end, but we’re continuing to run all three RX100-series cameras together - the RX100 has now been on the market for more than two years.




Will this strategy continue? Last year’s flagship becoming this year’s entry-level option?

Yes, we will keep the products on the market for as long as we can. This is a different strategy to the one we’ve used in the past. It’s good for us and also for the customers and retailers. 

How do you go about persuading someone who might be invested in another system to switch to Sony?

It’s not easy for people to switch, and we understand that. But right now some of those customers are buying our cameras and lenses in addition to their existing equipment. They appreciate the advantage of mirrorless equipment, which is twofold: light and small. The smaller the better and the lighter the better. In the past, small, light cameras often weren’t capable enough but after the introduction of the A7, there are no excuses.

With the Alpha a6000 and the SLT-77 II the focus was improved so much that older mirrorless models look slow. This is the kind of innovation that removes the ‘pain points’ from buying mirrorless cameras. And gradually we’re gaining customers, from new entry-level buyers to high-level amateurs and enthusiasts who are traditionally Canon and Nikon customers.

There are three Alpha 7 cameras on the market now. Can you give us an idea of how they’re selling, relative to one another?

The Alpha 7 is the standard model, and it attracts a wider range of customers. The A7R is a resolution-oriented camera, aimed especially at customers that do things like landscapes. Before we introduced the A7S we didn’t know who would buy it. At the moment, a lot of videographers are interested in it. Last week we attended the IBC conference in Amsterdam and already a lot of journalists were using the A7S for video.

How important is video to the the Alpha range as a whole?

Well historically the photo industry and video industry were completely separate. From Sony’s point of view we had been doing, but independently. But thanks to certain technological developments, the two have come together and now there is no great distinction. So we can make use of a common platform and create very specific, customized products according to customer feedback. 

The A7S is clearly a capable video camera, but ergonomically it is obviously designed in the same way as the A7 and A7R, for still shooting. Was it an experiment?

No. From what I’ve heard, in recent years a lot of professional photographers have needed to start creating video as well as stills - doing two jobs. One camera which can do both - like the A7S - is potentially better.


We had an issue with the A7R with shutter vibration reducing resolution in certain situations. How do you incorporate feedback like this from your users?

We take the feedback and make note of it, and we use it to improve the next generation of products.

Under the ‘Alpha’ brand you currently have two lens mounts - A and FE. How long do you see those two mounts running side-by-side?

We have one system - the Alpha system. Of course the origin of A and E mounts might seem different from a customer’s point of view, but they are fully compatible with one another using adapters. I don’t want to separate those mounts into two ‘systems’. That’s why we stopped using ‘NEX’ in favor of using a single family name - ‘Alpha’.

Before you made that change did you find that customers saw NEX and Alpha differently?

Yes. When we introduced the first NEX models we were going after new users, and families. So the image might have seemed ‘cheap’. 

Historically, Sony is seen by many people as an electronics company, not necessarily as a photography company. Do you think that this is still a problem?

There is still some problem with that, but my strong message to the market is that Sony is a serious photo manufacturer. We are strengthening our lens lineup as well.

How much Minolta is left in Sony?

Some of the old Minolta lenses are still very good - especially some of the long zoom lenses. In my team there are several former Minolta engineers, but our team is bigger now than Minolta’s was. So we can design new lenses completely from scratch [for the requirements of digital].

Sony is clearly putting a lot of effort into creating new lenses - where do you think you need to do more? 

The number. There are 13 lenses for the E mount currently but we still need to create more lenses to compete with other manufacturers. We’re catching up. One consistent request from our customers is macro lenses and wide-aperture lenses.

Do you think you need a big lens lineup to be taken seriously by professional photographers?

We certainly have a lot of work to do to gain a good reputation with professionals - like long zooms for sports and so on. But we also need to make more affordable, light and small lenses.

Is the AF system in your mirrorless cameras capable of predictive focus tracking in the same way as a conventional phase-detection AF system?

That depends on the lens. If we made a new lens, something like a 300mm or 400mm, yes - it would be possible with the new ‘4D’ focusing system in the a6000. But in terms of speed the AF system in the Alpha 7 cameras is a little slower.


.

So you’re not aiming the A7-series at sports photographers right now?

No, the A7 [series] isn’t capable of professional AF performance, but the a6000 is good enough for sports events.

So are you focusing on improving AF performance in the next generation of FE mount cameras?

I want to, yes.

Sony sensors can be found in cameras from several different manufacturers. How does your sensor business work?

When we make sensors we put them in several categories. [At any given time] one category of sensors is reserved purely for Sony cameras - we don’t sell them to other companies. Like the sensor in the A7S. But once we’ve enjoyed this advantage we might sell them on later, after some time has passed. This is the second category. The third category of sensors is completely generic - the sensors are created for use internally and to sell externally, to anybody. China or Taiwan or wherever.

Do you think that full-frame is the biggest size sensor that an enthusiast could ever need, or is there an opportunity for bigger sensors?

Bigger than full-frame? Of course there is opportunity there for medium format but it’s a niche. For now, thanks to developments in full-frame we can satisfy this need but there may be room to explore this opportunity [in the future].

How has the QX-series been received? What kind of feedback have you heard?

In the beginning, we had a lot of demand from gadget lovers, who really liked it. But after that initial boom was over we’ve had a very stable level of business. It’s maybe still a niche, but this is our challenge. This year we introduced the QX-1, an interchangeable lens-type QX camera. While it might still be a niche a lot of customers are interested in it for astrophotography, for instance, to attach to telescopes.



 

Although we marketed them as modules that you can attached to your phone, most QX users don’t attach the lenses in this way, they use them remotely. This has been very interesting.

  
 «이전 1  다음»