제 3회 니콘 레전드 출사 대회 (파주 영어마을)를 다녀왔습니다.

주 목적은, 니콘  카메라 체험 프로그램 (대여 서비스) 를 한다길래, 인물색감에 매우 실망하고 거의 10년동안 눈길도 안주었던 니콘 카메라가 얼마나 달라졌는지 알고싶어서 가봤습니다.


그런데 DSLR 넘버2 라는 니콘이 하는 행사 치고는 참 진행이 어설프고 부실하다는 생각입니다. 그래도 3번째인데,  파주 영어마을에서는 두번째 하는 행사인데 말이죠.


셔틀버스는 8시에 출발인데 7시 50분에 와서 피켓하나 들고 10분 서있다가 출발하고,  파주 영어마을에는 8시 30분도 안되서 도착했는데 9시 등록까지 기다려야하고 ( 뭐, 사진 찍으려고 그랬다고 칩시다 이건 )  , 사람이 별로 없어서 등록도 순식간에 끝났는데   정작 파주 영어마을 입장은 9시 30분이라서 또 기다려야하고,   정작 9시 30분에 입장하면 ?  할게 아무것도 없음.  모델들은  10시부터 포토존 들어온다고 하고....

그리고 경품 추첨까지 다 해서 행사끝나는건 18시인데, 셔틀버스는 파주영어마을에서 19시에 출발한다고 하는데 버스 덥다고 미리 타고있지도 못하고  30분동안 차밖에서 서있다가  18시 30분에 버스 타서 또 30분 기다려서 출발하고...   그렇게까지 기다려야할만큼 사람이 많이 탄것도 아님.   대충 18시에 행사 끝나고 버스 탈 사람들은 15분 이내에 전부 모인 상태...   그렇다고 더 빨리 출발하는건 절대 안된다고 하고.....  


대체 일정을 왜 이렇게 짠거임 ? -_-:::


그리고 니콘 체험 프로그램  카메라,렌즈 렌탈 서비스는 총 3회에,   대여시간 1시간 30분으로 잡아놨는데 뭔가 참....

1차 대여시간은  9시 30분 ~ 10시 30분,  반납시간은 11시 ~ 12시로 되어있는데, ㄹ 자로 줄은 쳐놨는데 입구 통제를 안해서 새치기로 나중에 온 사람이 먼저 렌탈을 하기도 하고,  렌탈해도 모델은 10시부터 포토존에 들어오니까 10시까지는 할게 없음.

2차 대여시간은 12 시부터 13시 까지 대여 시작,  반납은 13시 30분부터 14시 30분까지인데,   당연히 대여하려면 미리 줄서있어야겠죠 ?   대여 15분 전부터 기다린다 치고 12시 15분 정도에 대여를 받았다고 가정하면 1시간 30분 후인 1시 45분에는 반납해야함.  그런데 모델들은 밥먹는다고 점심시간에 포토존 철수함.  나도 밥먹어야하고.   대여 기다린 시간 30분, 점심시간 한시간 빼면  실제로 사용 가능한 시간은 얼마 되지도 않음.  -_-:::

그럼 3차 대여가 가장 오래 쓸 수 있는데,  14시 30분부터 15시까지 대여하고,  15시부터 16시 30분까지 반납을 함.  또  대여받기위해 15분 미리 서있다가 15분 후에 받으면 14시 45분에 카메라를 수령하고 무조건 1시간 30분 후인  16시 15분에 카메라를 반납해야함.    행사 종료는 17시.    어차피 마지막 3차 대여에서는  반납하고  다음 대여를 위해 바디와 렌즈를 재세팅하는 그런것도 없는데 ......

제발 4회때는 뭔가... 좀 오래 쓸 수 있도록 시간을 조정해주는 그런 센스를 기대해본다.


뭐, 아무튼... 니콘 써보기 위해 갔으니까 열심히 사진을 찍어봤는데, 한마디로 최신기종 풀프레임 d750 은 옛날 니콘같은데, 나온지 1년된 크롭 d7100 은 마치 캐논같아서 잘 모르겠음.

d750 은 오토화밸성능이 부정확하고, 인물색이 붉은기운기 끼는데 반해, d7100 은 오토화밸이 정확하고 인물색도 아주 좋았음.

특정 기종이 노출 언더 아니냐고 말하는 사람도 있지만, 적어도,  카메라의 LCD 상으로는 모두 정상적인 사진이었으며  , 

특정 기종의 LCD 를 볼때만 찍사의 눈에 이상이 발생했다거나,  몇시간만에  찍사의 사진 실력이 널뛰기하지는 않았을것이다. -_-:::


Nikon : D750 오토화밸 ( AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR , AF-S 85mm F1.4 G ) , D7100 오토화밸 ( AF-S 50mm F1.8  )

Canon : EOS M ( EF 50mm F1.8 II , EF-M 22mm F2 STM , EF-M 18-55 IS STM )


화이트밸런스로 인한 색감 차이 외에 볼만한 포인트는, 렌즈의 서로 다른 조리개와 초점거리에 따른 배경 흐림과 화각 차이.

문제는, 전날 캐논을 ISO 800 으로 세팅한걸 깜빡하고 한참동안을 ISO 800 으로 찍고다녔다는거...  확실히 고ISO 에서는 DR 도 줄고 발색도 이상해짐. 감안해서 보시라는...


모두 동일 시간대에서, JPEG 원본을 resize 한 것이다.  최대한 동일 구도(모델의 위치와 배경)의 사진을 골랐다.


특징점으로는 오전에는 하늘 전체에 구름이 껴서 약간 흐린 날씨로,  하늘 전체에 확산광이 퍼져있는 개인적으로 매우 좋아하는 날씨였다.

오후부터는 날씨가 좋아져서 해가 구름뒤로 숨었나 나왔다 하는 상태였다.

모델이 서있는 포토존마다 빛 상태가 완전히 달랐기때문에 그에 따른 차이도 감안해서 보는게 좋다. 


사진은 시간순.



Nikon D750 , AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR @ 190mm , F4.0 , 1/200s , ISO 100

EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F4 , 1/1250s , ISO 800




Nikon D750 , AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR @ 190mm , F4.0 , 1/200s , ISO 100

EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F4 , 1/1250s , ISO 800



Nikon D750 , AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR @ 200mm , F4 , 1/250 , ISO 100

 EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/3200s , ISO 800




Nikon D750 , AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR @ 165mm , F4 , 1/400s , ISO 100

 EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/4000s , ISO 800




Nikon D750 , AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR @ 200mm , F4 , 1/400s , ISO 100

 EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/4000s , ISO 800




Nikon D750 , AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR @ 116mm , F4 , 1/320s , ISO 100

 EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/4000s , ISO 800



Nikon D750 , AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR @116mm , F4 , 1/250s , ISO 100

 EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II  , F2.8 , 1/4000s , ISO 800




Nikon D750 , AF-S 70-200 F4 G VR @ 200mm , F4 , 1/125s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/4000s , ISO 800





Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F2 , 1/1000s , ISO 100

Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F4.5 , 1/4000s , ISO 800




Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F2 , 1/1250s , ISO 100

Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F4.5 , 1/4000s , ISO 800





Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F2.8 , 1/320s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F4 , 1/4000s , ISO 800



Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F2.8 , 1/400s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF-M 22mm F2 STM , F3.2 , 1/4000 , ISO 800



 Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F2.2 , 1/2500s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF-M 22mm F2 STM , F3.5 , 1/4000s , ISO 800




Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F2.2 , 1/2000s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF-M 22mm F2 STM , F3.5 , 1/4000s , ISO 800





 Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F2.2 , 1/1600s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF-M 22mm F2 STM , F3.5 , 1/4000s , ISO 800






Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F2.8 , 1/1600s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF-M 22mm F2 STM , F3.5 , 1/4000s , ISO 800






 Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F1.8 , 1/200s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF-M 22mm F2 STM , F2 , 1/4000s , ISO 800





 Nikon D750 , AF-S 85mm F1.8 G , F1.8 , 1/800s , ISO 100

 Canon EOS M , EF-M 22mm F2 STM , F2 , 1/4000s , ISO 800





여기서부터는 D7100 + 50mm F1.8   (D750 대여 실패...) 인데,  갑자기 사진이 너무 좋아져서 깜짝놀램. 

화이트밸런스가 극적으로 향상되고 피부톤도 살아남. D750 으로 오염된 눈이 정화되는 느낌.... -_-::::

나중에 안것인데, 대여받은 제품 디폴트가Adobe RGB 로 되어있었다 ( 파일명 앞에 _ 가 붙으면 adobe RGB )

D7100 은 원래 이런건지? 


그리고 EOS M 도 드디어 ISO 800 세팅된걸 알아채고 ISO 100 으로 바꿈.... T.T::


 Nikon D750 , AF-S 50mm F1.8 G , F2.8 , 1/400s , ISO 100 , Adobe RGB

 Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/3200s, ISO 800




Nikon D7100 , AF-S 50mm F1.8 G , F4 , 1/100s , ISO 100 , Adobe RGB

 Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F4 , 1/160s , ISO 100




 Nikon D7100 , AF-S 50mm F1.8 G , F4 , 1/200s , ISO 100 , Adobe RGB

 Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/640s , ISO 100




Nikon D7100 , AF-S 50mm F1.8 , F2.8 , 1/250s, ISO 100 , Adobe RGB

 Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/640 , ISO 100





 Nikon D7100 , AF-S 50mm F1.8 , F2.8 , 1/125s, ISO 100 , Adobe RGB

  Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/160s , ISO 100




 Nikon D7100 , AF-S 50mm F1.8 G , F2.8 , 1/200s , ISO 100 , Adobe RGB

  Canon EOS M , EF 50mm F1.8 II , F2.8 , 1/250 , ISO 100





렌탈서비스로 받은 니콘이 처음 만져보는 제품이다보니 세팅도 마음대로 하기 어렵고 아쉬운점이 많이 남는다.

특히 D750 은 화이트밸런스가 뭔가 내가 원하는 맑고 투명한 그런 느낌은 아니었는데,  아래 사진같이 묵직한 톤의 경우 그런 D750의 화이트밸런스가 분위기를 살려주는 예인것같다..













  

Photokina: Nikon defends lack of large-sensor CSC

Posted by TheFanStory 정보 : 2014. 9. 25. 10:09

http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/photo-news/photokina-nikon-defends-lack-large-sensor-csc-34658



Nikon Europe has brushed aside the rise of the large-sensor compact system camera, dismissing them as no longer ‘compact’ in size. The firm insists this gives the Nikon 1, a system launched three years ago, an edge over its rivals.

Asked why Nikon has not introduced a CSC with a large sensor, such as APS-C-size or full frame, Dirk Jasper, product manager at Nikon Europe’s professional products planning division, said: ‘You shouldn’t underestimate the Nikon 1 system…

‘OK, it’s a 1in sensor and not full frame, or APS-C-size.

‘On the other hand it gives us advantages over other systems because, looking at systems that have this size of sensor, sorry to say, they are no longer compact.’

Meanwhile, Jasper said Nikon has not been able to fulfil demand for the Nikon 1 V3 (pictured above) because the ‘response has been so great’.

In an interview with AP at Photokina, Jasper observed that some CSCs are moving closer in size to DSLRs, citing as examples the Fuji X-T1 (below) and Sony Alpha 7 models.

‘We have, and always will, bring new technologies to the market, but not at all costs…’


Jasper accepted that there has been growth in the CSC market but added: ‘The market is growing moderately, but that’s on a very small scale [in relation] to the size of the [overall] market.

‘In terms of total value and units, it is really small compared to what DSLR is still doing.’

Last month, Nikon revealed that it had suffered a 31% drop in global sales of interchangeable-lens digital cameras in the three months to 30 June.

‘The whole market has contracted since last year,’ said Jasper who explained that it is not simply a case of people now deciding to buy a CSC instead of a DSLR.

‘Mirrorless is not growing by the same amount.’

Nikon has faced questions about whether it will make a mirrorless camera for professional photographers.

Will Nikon, realistically, ever launch a professional-level mirrorless camera when so many of its users have invested in expensive lens and accessory systems over many years?

Jasper stressed that Nikon has already shown that DSLRs are not the ‘Holy Grail’, by launching the Nikon 1.

Though he could not predict whether DSLRs will be around forever, he claims they offer advantages over CSCs, in terms of AF speed, tracking and ‘reliability of the life cycle’.

And a high-end mirrorless system would need to win acceptance from professionals and many loyal enthusiasts – as well as offering the same ‘ecosystem’ as DSLR.

‘We race Formula 1. There are no second places here.

‘Yes, it [a professional mirrorless camera] might happen one day, but we cannot offer a “second best” solution for professionals…’


Read more at http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/photo-news/photokina-nikon-defends-lack-large-sensor-csc-34658#7378qL7tHPxMUTrK.99


  

[DPREVIEW]

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7726365599/photokina-2014-nikon-interview-large-sensor-mirrorless-could-be-a-solution



Toshiaki Akagi, Department Manager in Nikon's 1st Designing Department of the Development Center in the Imaging Business Unit. Pictured at Photokina in Germany.


When we visited Photokina last week in Germany we made time to sit down with senior executives from several camera manufacturers. Among them was Toshiaki Akagi, Department Manager in Nikon's 1st Designing Department. In our conversation we spoke about reaction to the D750, the legacy of the D600 oil problem and the potential for a large-sensor mirrorless camera from Nikon in the future.


What has reaction been like to the new D750?

It has been very well-received, globally. Especially the new body design using carbon-fiber material, and the tilting screen. The camera is intended to offer more versatility and greater usability in its position between the D610 and D810.

How important was video when you were planning the D750?

Because of our history and background, our first priority is high-quality still images. But we have to pay attention to market demand for movie features. 4K for example is something we have to study very carefully - when, and how we can provide a camera to meet demand to satisfy our customers. 



When we spoke to Nikon earlier this year we were told that you were seeing demand for 4K from some of your users - has work progressed in the meantime?

Work is ongoing - we cannot of course speak about forthcoming products but we have some ideas about [how to add] a 4K movie function to our DSLR lineup. There are several factors to consider when doing this - for example the image processing engine. So there are a lot of factors to study in order to find the best-balanced solution for a camera in the future. But it’s going well, and you can expect something in the future - maybe!

Do you think 4K is a technology of interest to filmmakers and stills photographers?

This is just my personal opinion - I am not speaking for Nikon. In my opinion, 4K is too much. Our current movie functionality is enough for our users. But some of our competitors, like Panasonic and Sony are adding 4K so we should aim for the same level of functionality in order to compete. 

Can you summarize your full-frame camera strategy?

Starting with the new camera, the D750, this is a lightweight, streamlined camera which is easy to carry, which offers a tilt LCD. That’s the concept for this product. The D810 is meant to deliver the widest dynamic range at low ISO sensitivities. The D4S is for customers who need more speed and durability. The D610 fulfills a demand for a reasonably priced full-frame camera, for more cost-sensitive customers.

Looking at the lenses that Nikon has released over the past few years, you have made a lot more full-frame FX-format optics than DX. Are you more focused on your full-frame customers?

We’ve been making new FX format cameras like the D810 and D750, so we need to have a good lineup of FX lenses. But of course we have the DX format lineup too and you can expect some new DX lenses in the future. We haven’t forgotten about our DX customers.



Do you want to move customers that might be (say) D300S users up to full-frame?

A certain portion of our DX customers have already moved up to full-frame sensors. But not all. We understand that there is still some demand for a successor to the D300S and all we can say at this moment is that we are studying that demand.

The D600 had a well-publicized problem with oil on its sensor, which affected a lot of your customers. A lot of people were very unhappy with Nikon’s response. If something like this comes up again in the future, would you handle things differently?

Internally, we took that issue very seriously, and when we created the D750 we reviewed our quality control process. It’s impossible to say for certain that we could avoid this kind of thing in the future, but we have certainly minimized the risk. As for handling such an issue differently it’s difficult to say since we cannot predict what might happen. But the D600 issue was very important, and very sensitive and we are trying our best to avoid that kind of problem again.

How will you approach the next few years?

It’s very difficult to say actually, because the market changes so quickly. So even if we believe we should follow a certain strategy a new product might come out from one of our competitors and everything might change. One issue is that people are replacing their cameras less frequently than in the past. People want better products but want to spend less money. So we have to decide what to prioritize.

If there was one area where you could improve modern digital cameras, what would it be?

Well there are two - firstly speed, in terms not only of AF but also general responsiveness. And secondly of course, image quality. We have some room to make further improvements [in both areas].



Are you seeing demand for a higher-resolution flagship, like a D3X replacement?

Yes, we know that some of our customers want a D3X successor. But again, we need to study this carefully. Which type of product should we prepare first - a successor to the D4S, or a replacement for the D3X? Speed, or resolution? We need to listen carefully to our customers.

As the DSLR market falters, what is your strategy for mirrorless?

The mirrorless market is growing rapidly, thanks to products from manufacturers like Sony. We know that there is a certain body of demand for larger sensors in mirrorless products. Although we already have the 1 inch sensor in the 1 System, we don't want to deny the possibility of future large-sensor mirrorless cameras. So maybe if there is enough demand we may be able to provide another type of mirrorless camera with larger sensors. This is one of the solutions.

  
 «이전 1  다음»