[NCN] Canon EOS-M Confession: “We blew it.”

Posted by TheFanStory 정보 : 2014. 10. 1. 16:35

[newcameranews.com]  2013.11.24.   Canon EOS-M Confession: “We blew it.”


n a candid interview*, Canon Small Project Manager Kawasaki Suzuki admitted that the mirrorless EOS-M camera was “a complete and utter tragedy on the scale of Hamlet” and that it “brought much shame to the house of Canon.”

The EOS-M was Canon’s first and only foray into the emerging class of “mirrorless” cameras, so-named because they omit the articulating mirror that puts the (R)eflex in DSLR. By most accounts, the diminutive EOS-M’s image quality rivaled Canon’s DSLRs, but the AF system was horrid, prompting most enthusiasts to walk right by.

“The EOS-M has…how do you American say it?…Donkey Balls.” To be honest, we are not quite sure what Suzuki meant by this analogy, so we asked for clarification. Suzuki responded, “When something holds great promise but fails because of one single thing.” We think he meant Achilles heel.

In recent years, each major camera manufacturer has released a mirrorless camera. Olympus, Panasonic, Sony, Pentax, and Fuji have all released models with varying degrees of success, with all but Pentax moving their entire product line to mirrorless models**. Internet pundits have predicted the ascendance of mirrorless cameras (along with the death of DSLRs) for years, with a subsequent re-ordering of the camera hierarchy.

Canon and Nikon, the two 800 pound gorillas of the industry, are the last to enter the consumer market, Nikon with the 1 series based on a 1” sensor, and Canon with the EOS-M. Both have been disappointments for one reason or another, with those same Internet pundits theorizing that the cameras were purposefully crippled in order to protect lucrative DSLR sales.

“No, we did not cripple the EOS-M on purpose,” claims Suzuki, his once impeccable black tie loosened, his top shirt button unbuttoned, and his once well-pressed shirt sleeves now bunched up around his elbows . “We tried really hard, but Canon senior management put just three people on the team, myself, a project manager, and an intern. This compares with 400 people that we had on the T5i team, but all I see is that they changed the 4 to a 5. But I am not bitter.”

By the end of the interview, Suzuki was alternately sobbing and hugging us and telling us that he loved us. He was also, amazingly, getting quite feisty as we sat in a late night diner satiating his munchies. “Just wait though!” Suzuki exclaimed, menacingly waving a gravy soaked French fry in the air. “The new dual pixel sensor technology in the 70d is going to be in the EOS-M2 and we are going to take over the world.”

And with those words, Suzuki fell asleep and slumped onto the table, his left cheek falling into the shallow bowl of gravy, a childlike smile forming on his face as he started to snore like a small puppy. After finishing our meal, we cleaned Suzuki up as much as we could and we brought him back to Canon headquarters, placing him gently on the chairs in the lobby. I suspect that this isn’t the last we hear from Suzuki. Or Canon, for that matter.

 

 

 

*By “candid”, we mean that we got Suzuki drunk on saki and continued to keep him an inebriated state until the sun was rising.

**We do not count Leica as a mirrorless camera since they never had a mirror in the first place. That, and NCN doesn’t cover the jewelry industry.

Follow NCN on the Facebooks, Twitters, and that other thing for the latest camera news.

  
  

Photokina: Nikon defends lack of large-sensor CSC

Posted by TheFanStory 정보 : 2014. 9. 25. 10:09

http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/photo-news/photokina-nikon-defends-lack-large-sensor-csc-34658



Nikon Europe has brushed aside the rise of the large-sensor compact system camera, dismissing them as no longer ‘compact’ in size. The firm insists this gives the Nikon 1, a system launched three years ago, an edge over its rivals.

Asked why Nikon has not introduced a CSC with a large sensor, such as APS-C-size or full frame, Dirk Jasper, product manager at Nikon Europe’s professional products planning division, said: ‘You shouldn’t underestimate the Nikon 1 system…

‘OK, it’s a 1in sensor and not full frame, or APS-C-size.

‘On the other hand it gives us advantages over other systems because, looking at systems that have this size of sensor, sorry to say, they are no longer compact.’

Meanwhile, Jasper said Nikon has not been able to fulfil demand for the Nikon 1 V3 (pictured above) because the ‘response has been so great’.

In an interview with AP at Photokina, Jasper observed that some CSCs are moving closer in size to DSLRs, citing as examples the Fuji X-T1 (below) and Sony Alpha 7 models.

‘We have, and always will, bring new technologies to the market, but not at all costs…’


Jasper accepted that there has been growth in the CSC market but added: ‘The market is growing moderately, but that’s on a very small scale [in relation] to the size of the [overall] market.

‘In terms of total value and units, it is really small compared to what DSLR is still doing.’

Last month, Nikon revealed that it had suffered a 31% drop in global sales of interchangeable-lens digital cameras in the three months to 30 June.

‘The whole market has contracted since last year,’ said Jasper who explained that it is not simply a case of people now deciding to buy a CSC instead of a DSLR.

‘Mirrorless is not growing by the same amount.’

Nikon has faced questions about whether it will make a mirrorless camera for professional photographers.

Will Nikon, realistically, ever launch a professional-level mirrorless camera when so many of its users have invested in expensive lens and accessory systems over many years?

Jasper stressed that Nikon has already shown that DSLRs are not the ‘Holy Grail’, by launching the Nikon 1.

Though he could not predict whether DSLRs will be around forever, he claims they offer advantages over CSCs, in terms of AF speed, tracking and ‘reliability of the life cycle’.

And a high-end mirrorless system would need to win acceptance from professionals and many loyal enthusiasts – as well as offering the same ‘ecosystem’ as DSLR.

‘We race Formula 1. There are no second places here.

‘Yes, it [a professional mirrorless camera] might happen one day, but we cannot offer a “second best” solution for professionals…’


Read more at http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/photo-news/photokina-nikon-defends-lack-large-sensor-csc-34658#7378qL7tHPxMUTrK.99


  

[DPREVIEW]

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7726365599/photokina-2014-nikon-interview-large-sensor-mirrorless-could-be-a-solution



Toshiaki Akagi, Department Manager in Nikon's 1st Designing Department of the Development Center in the Imaging Business Unit. Pictured at Photokina in Germany.


When we visited Photokina last week in Germany we made time to sit down with senior executives from several camera manufacturers. Among them was Toshiaki Akagi, Department Manager in Nikon's 1st Designing Department. In our conversation we spoke about reaction to the D750, the legacy of the D600 oil problem and the potential for a large-sensor mirrorless camera from Nikon in the future.


What has reaction been like to the new D750?

It has been very well-received, globally. Especially the new body design using carbon-fiber material, and the tilting screen. The camera is intended to offer more versatility and greater usability in its position between the D610 and D810.

How important was video when you were planning the D750?

Because of our history and background, our first priority is high-quality still images. But we have to pay attention to market demand for movie features. 4K for example is something we have to study very carefully - when, and how we can provide a camera to meet demand to satisfy our customers. 



When we spoke to Nikon earlier this year we were told that you were seeing demand for 4K from some of your users - has work progressed in the meantime?

Work is ongoing - we cannot of course speak about forthcoming products but we have some ideas about [how to add] a 4K movie function to our DSLR lineup. There are several factors to consider when doing this - for example the image processing engine. So there are a lot of factors to study in order to find the best-balanced solution for a camera in the future. But it’s going well, and you can expect something in the future - maybe!

Do you think 4K is a technology of interest to filmmakers and stills photographers?

This is just my personal opinion - I am not speaking for Nikon. In my opinion, 4K is too much. Our current movie functionality is enough for our users. But some of our competitors, like Panasonic and Sony are adding 4K so we should aim for the same level of functionality in order to compete. 

Can you summarize your full-frame camera strategy?

Starting with the new camera, the D750, this is a lightweight, streamlined camera which is easy to carry, which offers a tilt LCD. That’s the concept for this product. The D810 is meant to deliver the widest dynamic range at low ISO sensitivities. The D4S is for customers who need more speed and durability. The D610 fulfills a demand for a reasonably priced full-frame camera, for more cost-sensitive customers.

Looking at the lenses that Nikon has released over the past few years, you have made a lot more full-frame FX-format optics than DX. Are you more focused on your full-frame customers?

We’ve been making new FX format cameras like the D810 and D750, so we need to have a good lineup of FX lenses. But of course we have the DX format lineup too and you can expect some new DX lenses in the future. We haven’t forgotten about our DX customers.



Do you want to move customers that might be (say) D300S users up to full-frame?

A certain portion of our DX customers have already moved up to full-frame sensors. But not all. We understand that there is still some demand for a successor to the D300S and all we can say at this moment is that we are studying that demand.

The D600 had a well-publicized problem with oil on its sensor, which affected a lot of your customers. A lot of people were very unhappy with Nikon’s response. If something like this comes up again in the future, would you handle things differently?

Internally, we took that issue very seriously, and when we created the D750 we reviewed our quality control process. It’s impossible to say for certain that we could avoid this kind of thing in the future, but we have certainly minimized the risk. As for handling such an issue differently it’s difficult to say since we cannot predict what might happen. But the D600 issue was very important, and very sensitive and we are trying our best to avoid that kind of problem again.

How will you approach the next few years?

It’s very difficult to say actually, because the market changes so quickly. So even if we believe we should follow a certain strategy a new product might come out from one of our competitors and everything might change. One issue is that people are replacing their cameras less frequently than in the past. People want better products but want to spend less money. So we have to decide what to prioritize.

If there was one area where you could improve modern digital cameras, what would it be?

Well there are two - firstly speed, in terms not only of AF but also general responsiveness. And secondly of course, image quality. We have some room to make further improvements [in both areas].



Are you seeing demand for a higher-resolution flagship, like a D3X replacement?

Yes, we know that some of our customers want a D3X successor. But again, we need to study this carefully. Which type of product should we prepare first - a successor to the D4S, or a replacement for the D3X? Speed, or resolution? We need to listen carefully to our customers.

As the DSLR market falters, what is your strategy for mirrorless?

The mirrorless market is growing rapidly, thanks to products from manufacturers like Sony. We know that there is a certain body of demand for larger sensors in mirrorless products. Although we already have the 1 inch sensor in the 1 System, we don't want to deny the possibility of future large-sensor mirrorless cameras. So maybe if there is enough demand we may be able to provide another type of mirrorless camera with larger sensors. This is one of the solutions.

  

[DPREVIEW]

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/0661793352/photokina-2014-sony-interview-we-still-need-to-create-more-lenses


Could you summarize Sony’s camera strategy in one sentence?

We want to make serious cameras. In terms of our compact cameras, for example, the RX-series is the core. They’re differentiated from our competitors by offering big sensors, great picture quality and sophisticated cosmetic design. 

How important are new photographers to Sony compared to experts or enthusiasts?

In business terms, entry-level users, or amateurs are very important because there are so many opportunities. Traditional photo enthusiasts might be fond of using more traditional systems such as those from Canon or Nikon. They stick to those ecosystems, since they have a lot of lenses. But beginners might not have those kind of loyalties. We want to stimulate the interest of those customers in photography.

But we also need to earn a good reputation among professionals and higher-level amateurs. It’s kind of a chicken and egg situation. So firstly, our strategy is to get that reputation with enthusiasts. That’s why we started to make these serious, high-end cameras. And for the moment, we think, it is proving successful.

Do you think there is a gap in your lineup for a truly entry-level RX-series camera?

Yes and no. We are attracting a lot of new customers with the original RX100. It might look like a serious camera, but from an entry-level users’ point of view they can still take a good photography with a single press of a button. Any amateur photographer can use an RX100. The RX100 III is the top end, but we’re continuing to run all three RX100-series cameras together - the RX100 has now been on the market for more than two years.




Will this strategy continue? Last year’s flagship becoming this year’s entry-level option?

Yes, we will keep the products on the market for as long as we can. This is a different strategy to the one we’ve used in the past. It’s good for us and also for the customers and retailers. 

How do you go about persuading someone who might be invested in another system to switch to Sony?

It’s not easy for people to switch, and we understand that. But right now some of those customers are buying our cameras and lenses in addition to their existing equipment. They appreciate the advantage of mirrorless equipment, which is twofold: light and small. The smaller the better and the lighter the better. In the past, small, light cameras often weren’t capable enough but after the introduction of the A7, there are no excuses.

With the Alpha a6000 and the SLT-77 II the focus was improved so much that older mirrorless models look slow. This is the kind of innovation that removes the ‘pain points’ from buying mirrorless cameras. And gradually we’re gaining customers, from new entry-level buyers to high-level amateurs and enthusiasts who are traditionally Canon and Nikon customers.

There are three Alpha 7 cameras on the market now. Can you give us an idea of how they’re selling, relative to one another?

The Alpha 7 is the standard model, and it attracts a wider range of customers. The A7R is a resolution-oriented camera, aimed especially at customers that do things like landscapes. Before we introduced the A7S we didn’t know who would buy it. At the moment, a lot of videographers are interested in it. Last week we attended the IBC conference in Amsterdam and already a lot of journalists were using the A7S for video.

How important is video to the the Alpha range as a whole?

Well historically the photo industry and video industry were completely separate. From Sony’s point of view we had been doing, but independently. But thanks to certain technological developments, the two have come together and now there is no great distinction. So we can make use of a common platform and create very specific, customized products according to customer feedback. 

The A7S is clearly a capable video camera, but ergonomically it is obviously designed in the same way as the A7 and A7R, for still shooting. Was it an experiment?

No. From what I’ve heard, in recent years a lot of professional photographers have needed to start creating video as well as stills - doing two jobs. One camera which can do both - like the A7S - is potentially better.


We had an issue with the A7R with shutter vibration reducing resolution in certain situations. How do you incorporate feedback like this from your users?

We take the feedback and make note of it, and we use it to improve the next generation of products.

Under the ‘Alpha’ brand you currently have two lens mounts - A and FE. How long do you see those two mounts running side-by-side?

We have one system - the Alpha system. Of course the origin of A and E mounts might seem different from a customer’s point of view, but they are fully compatible with one another using adapters. I don’t want to separate those mounts into two ‘systems’. That’s why we stopped using ‘NEX’ in favor of using a single family name - ‘Alpha’.

Before you made that change did you find that customers saw NEX and Alpha differently?

Yes. When we introduced the first NEX models we were going after new users, and families. So the image might have seemed ‘cheap’. 

Historically, Sony is seen by many people as an electronics company, not necessarily as a photography company. Do you think that this is still a problem?

There is still some problem with that, but my strong message to the market is that Sony is a serious photo manufacturer. We are strengthening our lens lineup as well.

How much Minolta is left in Sony?

Some of the old Minolta lenses are still very good - especially some of the long zoom lenses. In my team there are several former Minolta engineers, but our team is bigger now than Minolta’s was. So we can design new lenses completely from scratch [for the requirements of digital].

Sony is clearly putting a lot of effort into creating new lenses - where do you think you need to do more? 

The number. There are 13 lenses for the E mount currently but we still need to create more lenses to compete with other manufacturers. We’re catching up. One consistent request from our customers is macro lenses and wide-aperture lenses.

Do you think you need a big lens lineup to be taken seriously by professional photographers?

We certainly have a lot of work to do to gain a good reputation with professionals - like long zooms for sports and so on. But we also need to make more affordable, light and small lenses.

Is the AF system in your mirrorless cameras capable of predictive focus tracking in the same way as a conventional phase-detection AF system?

That depends on the lens. If we made a new lens, something like a 300mm or 400mm, yes - it would be possible with the new ‘4D’ focusing system in the a6000. But in terms of speed the AF system in the Alpha 7 cameras is a little slower.


.

So you’re not aiming the A7-series at sports photographers right now?

No, the A7 [series] isn’t capable of professional AF performance, but the a6000 is good enough for sports events.

So are you focusing on improving AF performance in the next generation of FE mount cameras?

I want to, yes.

Sony sensors can be found in cameras from several different manufacturers. How does your sensor business work?

When we make sensors we put them in several categories. [At any given time] one category of sensors is reserved purely for Sony cameras - we don’t sell them to other companies. Like the sensor in the A7S. But once we’ve enjoyed this advantage we might sell them on later, after some time has passed. This is the second category. The third category of sensors is completely generic - the sensors are created for use internally and to sell externally, to anybody. China or Taiwan or wherever.

Do you think that full-frame is the biggest size sensor that an enthusiast could ever need, or is there an opportunity for bigger sensors?

Bigger than full-frame? Of course there is opportunity there for medium format but it’s a niche. For now, thanks to developments in full-frame we can satisfy this need but there may be room to explore this opportunity [in the future].

How has the QX-series been received? What kind of feedback have you heard?

In the beginning, we had a lot of demand from gadget lovers, who really liked it. But after that initial boom was over we’ve had a very stable level of business. It’s maybe still a niche, but this is our challenge. This year we introduced the QX-1, an interchangeable lens-type QX camera. While it might still be a niche a lot of customers are interested in it for astrophotography, for instance, to attach to telescopes.



 

Although we marketed them as modules that you can attached to your phone, most QX users don’t attach the lenses in this way, they use them remotely. This has been very interesting.

  
[DPREVIEW]

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7079726133/photokina-2014-canon-interview-mirrorless-in-the-very-near-future

(원문에는 사진 있음)


How has reaction been to the EOS 7D Mark II?

Really really positive. Sorry to keep you waiting for five years!

You’ve had a long time to get feedback from 7D owners - what did they want most in a replacement?

Besides a bigger sensor, they wanted the same sort of features found in the EOS-1D X. We did a lot of interviews with 7D users - more than 5000 people in total - and we think that in the EOS 7D Mark II we got very close to achieving EOS-1D-type features in a lightweight body.



 

How would you characterize the typical EOS 7D owner?

The user profile of 7D owners is ‘high amateur’ and enthusiasts who want high framerates and professional photographers who want a lightweight, fast camera. And also anyone who doesn’t want to carry something big and heavy.

Why did it take so long to replace the EOS 7D?

I will ask our engineers! But basically we reviewed the entire design and architecture of the camera, and we improved every part of the autofocus system. This all takes time.

Dual Pixel AF is in its second generation in the EOS 7D Mark II. How long do you think it will be before it can rival conventional phase-detection AF in terms of performance?

I don’t know. We are working on it but it’s very difficult.



Assuming you do achieve this, presumably at that point you won’t need a mirror?

Maybe…

What needs to happen before Canon will create a serious mirrorless camera?

We are serious. We are really focused on mirrorless and we’re spending lots of time, and devoting a lot of manpower to scaling up mirrorless development right now. 

What has changed? Why are you more serious now than in previous years?

We’ve actually been serious about it since the very beginning.

The EOS 7D Mark II omits built-in Wi-Fi. Is this feature less important to 7D II users compared to (say) 70D owners?

No, we don’t think so. We considered adding this feature to the EOS 7D II but the body material presented challenges. But we have a solution with the optional Wireless File Transmitter WFT-E7A.

Canon released two cameras at Photokina - the EOS 7D Mark II and PowerShot G7X. One thing we’ve learned is that the sensor in the G7X is not made by Canon. Does this represent a new philosophy at Canon?

We select the best sensor, whoever the manufacturer is. That’s our policy.


 

One thing we know from our own testing is that Canon DSLR sensors can’t quite compete with some modern sensors from Sony in terms of dynamic range. How important to you is developing sensor technology?

We are very focused on getting the best image quality. I’m not sure what measurements you’re looking at but when it comes to dynamic range for example we consider image quality as a whole, from low to high ISO sensitivities and on balance we consider our sensors to be the best.

My ideal camera is one that can take a picture in any environment from complete darkness to the brightest sunshine.

So in your opinion your sensors are currently the best on the market?

Yes. In the EOS 7D Mark II for example the sensor we’ve used is improved compared to the previous generation, especially at high ISO and in shadows. There’s less noise.

Currently no Canon camera offers more than 22MP. Do your DSLR customers ask for higher resolution? 

Yes. We know that many of our customers need more resolution and this is under consideration. In the very near future you can expect us to show something in terms of mirrorless and also a higher resolution sensor.

Mr Maeda, you’ve been at Canon for a number of years. Looking back, what are you most proud of?

My team. Also the fact that we brought video to the DSLR world, and the Digital Elph / IXUS. We created something stylish, which was widely copied by our competitors.


 

Canon established ‘the’ digital camera concept and everybody else followed. We were also very proud of our film cameras, and the way that we continued and made the transition to digital with the two brands - EOS and Elph / IXUS.

When was the first time you saw a picture from a Canon digital camera and thought ‘that’s better than film’?

2004. That’s when the reproduction of color exceeded the capabilities of film. Across our entire product line.

That was ten years ago - what’s the next big moment?

You tell me!

  

[etnews] 유럽 UHD TV 표준 확정, `HDCP 2.2`·`HDR` 주목

Posted by TheFanStory 정보 : 2014. 9. 22. 20:36

[etnews] 유럽 UHD TV 표준 확정, `HDCP 2.2`·`HDR` 주목


http://www.etnews.com/20140917000671


17일 디지털유럽과 업계에 따르면 디지털유럽은 최근 독일 베를린에서 유럽 판매 UHD TV 규격과 인증 로고(사진)를 발표했다. 4K 해상도, 50~60프레임(fps), 8비트 색상, 2채널 PCM 스테레오 오디오 등 시판 중인 UHD TV 규격의 대부분을 표준으로 인정했다. 여기에 HDCP 2.2를 의무로, HDR(High Dynamic Range)를 자율적으로 반영토록 했다.



  
[SLRCLUB 688 님의 글입니다. ]
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=canon_d30_forum&divpage=784&page=4&no=4213943


제목 캐논의 새로운 마운트 검토 떡밥(DC Watch)
작성자 688 작성일 2014/09/19 14:35:54    
0

칠두막 덕에 요즘은 캐논 게시판을 더 많이 찾게 되네요...

일본 게시판 반응은 새 마운트란 게 마포 아니면 1" 센서 아니냐 하는 반응이 많은 것 같습니다만, EF-M 생각하면 굳이 MFT까지 걸칠 필요는 없을 것 같고... 1" 교환식 카메라는 니콘이 똥망...하고 있고요. 아직은 연구단계니까 위의 것들을 검토하고 있긴 하겠죠.

어쩌면, 소니가 당초에 E마운트는 APS-C 전용이라고 했다가 135포맷까지 겸해버린 것도 봤으니... 135까지 겸할 수 있는 미러리스 마운트도 검토 대상에 있는지도 모르겠네요.



http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/interview/20140918_667456.h...

【フォトキナ】現行マウントに加え新システムも模索――キヤノン
イメ-ジコミュニケ-ション事業本部長 眞榮田雅也氏

[포토키나] 현행 마운트에 추가하여 새로운 시스템도 모색 - 캐논
이미지 커뮤니케이션 사업본부장 마에다 마사야 전무


――今回は待望のEOS 7D Mark IIに加え、交換レンズ、それに高級コンパクトカメラのPowerShot G7Xと豊富な新製品を用意しました。しかし、市場環境の變化に對して從來路線の延長で“より良い後繼機種”を續けている印象もあります。レンズ交換式カ メラ將來ビジョンや、それに伴う製品展開についてどう考えていますか?

이번에는 EOS 7D Mark II에 교환렌즈, 그리고 고급 컴팩트 카메라 파워샷 G7X 등 풍부한 신제품을 준비했습니다. 그러나 시장환경의 변화에 대하여 종래노선의 연장으로 "보다 좋은 후계기종"을 잇는다는 인상도 있습니다. 렌즈교환식카메라의 장래 비전과 그에 수반한 제품전개를 어떻게 생각하십니까?



EFレンズ、EF-Mレンズを中心としたラインナップで、より良い製品を開發、提供して、その時?に最高の製品を提供することで攻めていく姿勢はこれから も變えません。この數年、我我はEFレンズを常に最新のトレンドに添ったシステムとなるようアップデ-トしながら、カメラボディの性能向上に取り組んでき ました。

EF렌즈, EF-M렌즈를 중심으로한 라인업에, 보다 좋은 제품을 개발, 제공하여 그때마다 최고의 제품을 제공하도록 노력하는 자세는 앞으로도 변하지 않습니다. 요즘 수년간, 저희들은 EF렌즈를 항상 최신 트렌드에 부합하는 시스템이 되로록 업데이트를 하여 카메라 바디의 성능향상과 조합할 수 있었습니다.



“より良い後繼機種”は今後も出し續けていますが、一方でニ-ズの多樣化、變化に對應するための硏究開發や商品企劃に對しても取り組んでいます。その中には、EFシステムとは異なる新しいマウントシステムの?究開?もあります。

"보다 좋은 후계기종"은 앞으로도 계속 냅니다만, 한편으로 수요의 다양화, 변화에 대응하기 위해 연구개발과 상품기획에 대해서도 대응하고 있습니다. 그 중에는 EF시스템과 다른 새로운 마운트 시스템의 연구개발도 있습니다.




――新マウントシステムというと、EFマウントの次と捉えられてしまう場合もあると思いますが、今の話からすると“EFマウントとは別に、EFマウントではカバ?できない領域に提供する新マウントシステム”ということでしょうか?

새로운 마운트 시스템이라 하면 EF시스템의 대체로 연결지어지는 경우도 있겠습니다만, 지금의 얘기는 "EF마운트와 별도로, EF마운트가 커버할 수 없는 영역에 제공되는 새로운 마운트 시스템"입니까?



現時点では“模索を續けているところ”ですが、レンズとカメラボディの通信インタ?フェイス、光?設計、センサ-設計などあらゆる面で“未來にはどうなるか”を想定しながら、次世代のプラットフォ-ムを檢討しています。

현시점에서는 "모색을 계속하고" 있습니다만, 렌즈와 바디의 인터페이스, 광학설계, 센서설계 등 여러 방면에서 "미래에는 어떻게 될 것인가"를 상정하여 차세대의 플랫폼을 검토하고 있습니다.



このような硏究開發を行っている理由は、カメラに對するニ-ズのひとつにダウンサイジングがあるためです。EFレンズを中心としたEOSシステムでは、常に最高の?質を提供しようと努力していますが、そうした方向とは別に小型化を求める聲があるのも事實です。

이런 연구개발을 행하는 이유는, 카메라에 대한 수요 중에 하나로 다운사이징이 있기 때문입니다. EF렌즈를 중심으로 한 EOS시스템은 항상 최고의 화질을 제공하도록 노력하고 있습니다만, 그런 방향과 별도로 소형화를 요구하는 목소리가 있음도 사실입니다.



――これまでシステムカメラの小型化ニ-ズに對しては、EF-M(EOS Mシリ?ズ)で??していくと仰っていました。

이때까지의 시스템카메라 소형화 수요에 대해선 EF-M(EOS M시리즈)로 대응하겠다고 하셨습니다.



もちろん、EF-Mは一生懸命やっていきます。EOSシステムと同等の畵質を維持しながら、その中で携?性を最大限に高めているのがEOS Mのシステムです。今年もEF-Mレンズのラインナップを?化しましたが、これは引き?き行っていきますし、ボディの新製品もそう遠くないうちに提供でき ます。EOS Mシステムの携帶性は、まだまだ改善できますので、そこはどんどん攻めていきます。

물론 EF-M도 열심히 하고 있습니다. EOS시스템과 동등한 화질을 유지하면서 그 중에서 휴대성을 최대한 높인 것이 EOS M시스템입니다. 올해에도 EF-M렌즈의 라인업을 강화합니다만, 이것은 계속해서 할 것이고 바디의 신제품도 그리 멀지 않은 시기에 제공할 수 있습니다. EOS M시스템의 휴대성은 아직도 개선할 수 있기 때운에 그 부분을 계속 공략합니다.



――ではEF、EF-Mに對する注力は變わらないということですね。

그렇다면 EF-M에 대한 노력은 변하지 않는다는 말씀이군요.



はい。EFもEF-Mもコンパクト化に對しては、それぞれのフォ-マットにおいて、最大限に努力はしていきます。その上で“これからのシステムカメラ”の硏究開發を行っているということです。

예, EF도 EF-M도 컴팩트화에 대해해서는 각자의 플랫폼에서 최대한의 노력을 하고 있습니다. 그 바탕 위에서 "이후의 시스템카메라"의 연구개발을 행하는 겁니다.



――それはより小さなセンサ-フォ-マットの新マウントを檢討するということでしょうか?

그것은 보다 작은 센서 포맷의 새로운 마운트를 검토하는 것입니까?



單一面積で取りこめるフォトンの量は限られていますから、小さなフォ-マットで高畵質はとても難しくなります。將來、光電變換の效率(センサ-性能、光學 設計、映像處理)のスペック向上を考慮した上で、どのぐらいのサイズのセンサ-、システムが最適なのか。その最適解が大きなテ-マになります。

단일 면적에 수광할 수 있는 광자의 양은 한정되어 있기 때문에 작은 포맷에서 고화질은 어려워집니다. 장래 광전 변환의 효율(센서 성능, 광학설계, 이미지프로세싱)의 스펙 향상을 고려한 바탕 위에서 어느 정도 사이즈의 센서, 시스템이 최적인가. 그 최적해답이 큰 테마입니다.



――光電變換效率の向上に伴う小型センサ-の畵質向上という面で言うならば、たとえばマイクロフォ-サ-ズは、ちょうど良いシステムサイズに收まっていませんか?

광전 변환의 효율 향상에 수반한 소형 센서의 화질향상 측면을 얘기한다면, 예를 들면 마이크로포서드는 딱 좋은 시스템 사이즈에 수렴되지 않습니까?



未來を見すえた上で、それが本當に最適解なのであれば、マイクロフォ-サ-ズを採用しても構わないと思います。顧客に最大限の價値を提供するという?点で良いシステムとなればいいんです。

미래를 바라보고나서 그것이 정말로 최적해답이라면, 마이크로포서드의 채용도 개의치 않는다고 생각합니다. 고객에 최대한의 가치를 제공하는 관점에서 좋은 시스템이 되면 그만입니다.



しかし、現時点で我我がEOS 5D Mark IIIやEOS 6DとEFレンズ群で出せている“繪の品質”は、將來のダウンサイジング新システムでも提供できなければならないとも思います。“一眼だからあの畵質”で はなく、“寫眞”を撮影する裝置として必要だと考えているからです。

그러나 현시점에서 저희들의 EOS 5K Mark III와 EOS 6D와 EF렌즈군에서 내는 "화질"은, 장래의 다운사이징 신 시스템에서도 제공되지 않으면 안된다고 생각합니다. "SLR이기 때문에 그런 화질"이 아니라, "사진"을 촬영하는 장치로서 필요하다고 생각하기 때문입니다.



その品位レベルを出せるギリギリのサイズはどのぐらいなのか。また、そのサイズでシステム全體のサイズをどこまで小さく出來るのか。今のところ新マウントシステムとして立ち上げられるという判斷には至っておらず、よって模索を續けています。
그 품질 레벨을 낼 수 있는 한계의 사이즈가 어느 정도인가. 또한 그 사이즈로 시스템 전체의 사이즈를 어디까지 작게 낼 수 있는가. 현재로서는 새 마운트 시스템으로서 상품화된다는 판단에 이르지 않고 모색을 계속하고 있습니다.

- 중략 -

――すでに9月ですが、年內にまだ新しい製品が投入される予定はありますか?

이미 9월입니다만, 올해 안에 새로운 제품이 투입될 예정은 없습니까?


昨年のインタビュ-で、來年は“面白いレンズ”を出すよと話していたと思いますが、?はまだ出せていません。それが年內には投入されます。交換レンズシステムとして新しい面白さを演出する製品になるので、樂しみにしておいてください。

작년 인터뷰에서 내년에는 "재미있는 렌즈"를 낸다고 얘기했습니다만, 실은 아직 나오지 않았습니다. 그것이 올해 안에 투입됩니다. 교환렌즈 시스템으로서 새로운 재미를 연출하는 제품이기 때문에 기대해주세요.


PS ( 688 님 PS 입니다 )
100-400 대체는 물건이 재미있든 없든 낼 때가 되지 않았나... -_-


  

쾰른 국제 사진 영상 기자재 박람회[포토키나 *Photokina 2014*]

2014.Photokina . 2014년 09월 16일 ~ 09월 21일. 독일 쾰른





Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II key specifications:

  • 20MP Dual-Pixel AF CMOS Sensor
  • 10 fps continuous shooting with autofocus
  • 65 all cross-type autofocus sensor
  • 150,000 RGB pixel metering sensor
  • Dual Digic 6 processors
  • Enhanced environmental sealing
  • Compact Flash (UDMA) and SD (UHS-I) slots
  • USB 3.0
  • Built-in GPS
  • Larger-capacity LP-E6N battery
  • Shutter speeds up to 1/8000th seconds
  • Shutter rated to 200,000 cycles (vs 150,000 on 7D)




Canon PowerShot G7 X




- 센서는 1 인치 20 MP CMOS 센서
- 렌즈는 환산 24-100 mm F1.8-2.8
- 인텔리전트 광학 손떨방
- 동영상은 5축 손떨방
- DIGIC6
- AF는 31점.터치 AF가 가능
- 액정 모니터는 틸트 UP 180 도 .104만 화소.터치 패널
- 플래시 내장
- 노출 보정 다이얼
- 컨트롤 링
- ND필터 내장
- 동영상은 풀 HD 60 p.스테레오
- 메뉴얼 동영상 컨트롤
- Wi-Fi내장.NFC. 스마트 폰에 의한 리모트 콘트롤 기능





Canon PowerShot SX60 HS with 65x zoom






Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II USM


Canon EF 24-105mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM



Canon EF-S 24mm F2.8 STM Pancake





Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 smartphone with 1-inch sensor



Key specifications:

  • 20MP 1-inch CMOS sensor
  • F2.8 aperture
  • 28mm equivalent focal length
  • ISO 100-25,600
  • 4K-video
  • Raw capture
  • 1.1MP front camera
  • 4.7-inch 1080p display
  • Android 4.4
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon S801 quad-core processor
  • 2GB RAM
  • 16GB built-in memory
  • microSD cards up to 128GB
  • 2600mAh batttery




Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review




Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5

Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm)


Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5




Olympus PEN E-PL7

Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm)


Olympus PEN E-PL7 First Impressions Review

  

[기사 소개]


기글 하드웨어 뉴스 리포트 - 캐논이 자랑하는 광각 줌 최신 기술


http://gigglehd.com/zbxe/11863872   <- 기사 보러 가기



EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM와 EF-S 10-18mm F4.5-5.6 IS STM의 특징

EF & EF-S 렌즈 최초의 손떨림 보정(IS) 탑재 초광각 줌
양면 비구면 렌즈를 2장 채용해 주변부 화질을 향상(EF 16-35mm)
플라스틱 몰드 비구면 렌즈로 저렴한 가격과 높은 화질을 실현(EF-S 10-18mm)
대구경 비구면 렌즈의 생산 기술을 확립해 새로운 초광각 줌을 실현


EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM
대구경의 양면 비구면 렌즈를 정확하게 생산할 수 있는 기술이 확립

대구경 렌즈에 양면 비구면 렌즈를 채용한 것은 이번이 처음
광학 설계 뿐만 아니라 그것을 실제 제품으로 만들어 내는 생산 기술이 모두 진화

EF 16-35mm F2.8L USM과 EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM을 비교하면 F8까지 조여서 촬영한 경우에는 새로 나온 EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM가 최신 광학 기술이 들어간 만큼 화질이 더 높다


EF-S 10-18mm F4.5-5.6 IS STM

표준 줌 키트와 더블 줌 키트를 구입한 후에 살만한  광각 줌 렌즈

렌즈를 바꿔 끼울 수 있는 DSLR의 즐거움 , 렌즈를 바꿔 끼움으로서 확산되는 표현의 세계

EF-S 10-22mm F3.5-4.5 USM 보다 EF-S 10-18mm F4.5-5.6 IS STM 이 가격은 싸도 고성능 렌즈

대구경 플라스틱 몰드 비구면 렌즈의 생산 기술의 확립해 EF-S 10-18mm의 제품화가 가능

소형, 경량화, 저렴한 가격을 실현. 초보도 쓰기 쉬운 초광각 줌 렌즈.


양면 비구면 렌즈가 앞으로 광각 렌즈의 광학 기술을 지탱할 것
미러리스 카메라 초광각 줌렌즈의 주변부 화질이 좋은 것도 백 포커스가 짧아 광각 계통에 유리할 뿐만 아니라, 왜곡 수차의 보정을 디지털에 맡기고 그 만큼 시야 곡률 만곡의 보정에 주력했기 때문

하지만 DSLR용 렌즈는 뷰파인더가 디지털 보정을 반영하지 않기에 왜곡 보정도 광학적으로 보정할 필요가 있습니다. 양면 비구면 렌즈의 채용과 그 생산 기술의 향상이 이 광학 성능을 실현한 포인트





[소감]

EF-S 10-18mm F4.5-5.6 IS STM 

: 캐논 크롭 바디 사용자이고,  광각이 필요 (ex : 여행 ) 하면 그냥 묻지도 따지지도 말고 무조건 사야하는 렌즈

: 풀프레임 환산 16-29mm 라는 어마어마한 화각을 단돈 30만원에 즐길 수 있는  진정한 캐논 크롭의 축복.



  
 «이전 1  다음»